Exploring the shifting landscape of medication-based drug treatment and safer supply in the fentanyl era: a research program to address the evolving overdose crisis in BC

Canada continues to grapple with an overdose crisis driven by illicitly manufactured fentanyl and novel psychoactive substances (e.g., etizolam, xylazine). The drug treatment landscape is rapidly evolving in response, and includes the implementation and expansion of a number of medication-based drug treatments (e.g., oral and injectable hydromorphone) and prescribed safer supply programs (SSP) that provide pharmaceutical alternatives to the toxic drug supply. However, socio-structural factors have impeded broader expansion and support, and SSP remain controversial with many healthcare providers expressing concern. This ethno-epidemiological research program will gather the views of people who use drugs, policymakers, and health system actors across BC to explore how individual, social, structural and environmental factors shape access to and outcomes from existing and emerging medication-based drug treatment programs and SSP. This is a critical opportunity examine the rapidly shifting drug treatment and overdose response landscape to better inform public health approaches to the ongoing overdose crisis. Knowledge gained will inform and guide future policy and public health developments to improve the lives of people who use drugs.

Evaluating treatment and employment outcomes in adults with prescription opioid use disorder initiating methadone maintenance or buprenorphine/naloxone opioid agonist therapies in a pan-Canadian pragmatic randomized clinical trial

Since 2016, Canada has been facing a national opioid overdose crisis that continues to have devastating effects on people who use opioids, their families, and communities across the country. Opioid agonist therapies (OATs), such as methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone, are considered first-line treatment options for people with opioid use disorder (OUD) and have shown to reduce overdoses, cravings, and withdrawal symptoms. As a response to the ongoing opioid crisis, researchers with the Canadian Research Initiative on Substance Misuse (CRISM) launched OPTIMA, a 24-week pan-Canadian clinical trial that compared the effectiveness of methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone models among adults with OUD. The OPTIMA trial was conducted between 2017 and 2020 across four provinces in Canada, including British Columbia, where Dr. M Eugenia Socías led as the regional principal investigator. To learn more about the OPTIMA trial, visit here: https://www.optima-trial.com/.
One factor, employment, has shown to have many positive associations for people with OUD, but also present challenges for people on OATs. For instance, methadone typically requires daily attendance at a dispensing pharmacy, which can be a barrier to acquire or sustain employment. On the other hand, buprenorphine-naloxone has a more flexible take-home dosing option, which may improve patient autonomy. However, there is limited research on the differences between different treatment methods. My project aims to evaluate the bidirectional effects of employment and OATs on treatment outcomes among people with OUD, using the data from the OPTIMA trial. This research has been recognized and funded by CANTRAIN-CTTP & Michael Smith Health Research BC (Health Research BC) Master’s Studentship 2023 Award Program. The proposed research aims to further the equitable expansion of evidence-based policies and practices in BC, hopefully contributing to the improvement of addiction care and harm reduction for people who use opioids.

Evaluating the use of prescription psychostimulants for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorder

Crystal meth is a powerful stimulant that is increasingly implicated in the ongoing overdose crisis in BC. Despite steadily increasing rates of crystal meth detection in overdose deaths, little is understood about the specific role that it may be playing in the overdose crisis, and treatment options for those suffering from crystal meth use disorder (MUD) are limited.

One class of medications that has previously shown some promise in the treatment of MUD are prescription stimulants such as those used to treat ADHD. While research in this area remains inconclusive, there is some suggestion that these medications may play a helpful role in the treatment of MUD, especially among patients with an overlapping diagnosis of opioid use disorder.

This proposal will employ a variety of research methodologies to explore two related questions: (1) Can we identify patients who use crystal meth and opioids that are at particularly high risk of overdose, and (2) Are prescription stimulants a helpful tool in the treatment of MUD in a population of patients who use opioids? These results will have significant implications for both healthcare providers and those suffering from MUD, at a time where new tools are sorely needed.

Housing, homelessness, and care trajectories among young people who use drugs in Vancouver

The proposed study will employ longitudinal qualitative and ethnographic methods to examine how urban young people who use drugs (YPWUD) navigate experiences of housing and homelessness across time. Cities like Vancouver are creating more comprehensive and integrated systems of services for YPWUD, including programs that aim to simultaneously address their housing and care needs (e.g. supportive housing with on-site access to harm reduction, opioid agonist therapies). Innovative social science research is needed to describe how particular supportive and temporary modular housing models can both ameliorate and exacerbate health and social harms among YPWUD, including overdose. The proposed anthropological and community-based participatory action research study will generate new knowledge to support the development, adaptation and scale up of targeted housing and substance use care interventions for YPWUD. Working together with a Youth Advisory Council comprised of YPWUD and youth co-researchers, study findings will be disseminated via youth-driven outputs aimed at a broad public; presentations and community reports for youth, their providers and key decision makers; and press releases, media interviews, and social media engagement.

Investigating women’s socio-structural risk environment of overdose

British Columbia, Canada, continues to grapple with an overdose epidemic. Substantial gaps remain in the implementation and scale up of overdose prevention strategies, including attention to gender equity. Little has been said regarding how marginalized women (trans inclusive) are impacted by the crisis, or how they might be differently navigating overdose risk environments or access to life-saving health services.

The ultimate goal is to generate new evidence to reduce overdose-related harms among women who use drugs and increase the responsiveness of existing and emerging overdose interventions to gender inequities. The objectives of this research program are to:

  1. Identify how women’s overdose risk is shaped by evolving individual, social, structural, and environmental factors;
  2. Investigate factors that create barriers to (or that facilitate) women’s engagement with existing, novel and emerging overdose prevention interventions; and
  3. Document perspectives, experiences, and impact of women who use drugs working in overdose-related interventions to inform how best to optimize their engagement in ongoing and future initiatives.

Investigating the impact of evolving cannabis access and use on high-risk drug use behaviours and addiction treatment

Cannabis remains the most widely produced, trafficked and consumed illicit drug worldwide, and at this time Canada and many other countries are implementing alternative regulatory approaches to cannabis. While research on cannabis has traditionally focused on the harms of cannabis use, an emerging body of evidence suggests that cannabis use can also alter high-risk drug practices, such as reducing cocaine use, opioid use and associated overdose. Much of this work suggests that cannabis is often used as a substitute for harder drugs of abuse which may have important implications for health policy responses to the current opioid epidemic in British Columbia.

However, this evidence has been primarily cross-sectional and ecological in nature, and lacking are rigorous longitudinal studies unpacking the precise impacts of cannabis use and evolving cannabis policy on the development of high-risk drug use behaviours. Further, the impacts of cannabis use on HIV and addiction treatment outcomes remains unclear. In light of the recent legalization of non-medical cannabis, identifying the impacts of cannabis on high-risk substance use and drug treatment outcomes will be important for informing clinical and public health practice, as well as policy.

Prevalence, patterns, and harms associated with the co-injection of illicit opioids and crystal methamphetamine

Crystal methamphetamine use is associated with a wide array of physical and social harms. In spite of this, its prevalence is rising in many parts of North America. Several small studies have suggested increasing rates of co-injection of methamphetamine and opioids, though no research has focused on the specific harms associated with this trend. In Vancouver, preliminary reports have noted a similar pattern, in a context where fentanyl has become the most widely used form of illicit opioid.

In this study we propose to use a prospective cohort of people who inject drugs to ask how trends in the co-injection of methamphetamine and opioids are changing over time, and to explore the health consequences associated with this pattern of substance use as it relates to overdose risk and response to treatment.

Answering these questions will provide insight into important changes in the evolving epidemiology of substance use, and will provide information on potential implications. An appreciation of these changing patterns is not only crucial in developing evidence-based harm reduction and treatment strategies, but also in understanding how to devote treatment resources appropriately in the fight to reduce opioid-related deaths.

Improving substance use care for gay, lesbian and bisexual youth in British Columbia

Gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth (GLBY) are at increased risk of experiencing substance use disorders (SUD) in comparison to their heterosexual counterparts. The aim of Dr. Ferlatte’s research is to identify the factors associated with SUD experienced by GLBY to inform interventions.

This will include:

  1. Examining individual, social and structural factors that influence SUD among GLBY through photovoice methods.
  2. Identifying challenges experienced by GLBY in accessing SUD-related care by gathering experiences through an online survey.
  3. Identifying how a coordinated set of interventions and policies could best be adapted to address SUD among GLBY through two world cafés, where GLBY and other stakeholders (e.g., intervention decision makers) will be invited to identify solutions to this issue.

The findings of this research will be shared through presentations, articles, and photovoice exhibitions to inform policy and programming decision-making that improves SUD care for GLBY.

Optimizing care for opioid use disorder in British Columbia

British Columbia is facing an unprecedented and escalating opioid crisis, underscoring the urgent need for innovative science-driven solutions. There is critical implementation gap of evidence-based care for opioid use disorder (OUD), this research will seek to narrow this gap.

First, Dr. Socias will seek to advance the implementation of evidence-base treatments for OUD, by leading a series of ongoing and planned clinical trials evaluating innovative and promising models of care (e.g. take-home strategies) and alternate treatment options (e.g. slow-release oral morphine).

Second, leveraging vast data from two long-standing cohort studies of over 3,000 people who use drugs, she will apply innovative quality metrics (i.e., cascade of care framework) to evaluate the impacts of addiction health system implementation efforts in BC over time. Identifying individual-, social- and structural-level facilitators and barriers to uptake and effectiveness of novel interventions, as well as to how these new addiction programs may impact health care access and outcomes of OUD care and related comorbidities (e.g. HIV, hepatitis C) will be key to informing efforts to improve the delivery of addiction care in BC.

 


End of Award Update – April 2024

 

Results

Findings from the OPTIMA trial showed that more flexible approaches to opioid use disorder care are similarly effective than more traditional approaches requiring people to go to the pharmacy every day. This has important clinical and policy implications as there is substantial evidence, including from my own research, that rigid models of care are one of the main barriers to retention in treatment, and that discontinuation from treatment increase the risk of overdose and death. We are now evaluating the effectiveness of novel pharmacotherapies in real-world settings.

 

Impact

Findings from my research have informed clinical guidelines, and policy decisions (re-introduction of methadone formulation in the OAT program in BC).

 

Potential Influence

I expect that findings from my research evaluating slow-release morphine will have implications to better understand its benefits and risks in the continuum of care of opioid use disorder.

 

Next Steps

I will continue with research to close the implementation gap in substance use care, including opioid use disorder, but also using some of the learnings to address alcohol use, which has a substantial burden of disease.

Improving substance use treatment trajectories for men who have sex with men

British Columbia is currently in the process of developing and implementing new evidence-based policies and clinical reforms to address problematic substance use, including new: (i) pharmacotherapy approaches (e.g., replacement therapies); (ii) clinical practice guidelines; and (iii) integrated service delivery models of care. While men who have sex with men (MSM) represent a key group with historically high levels of substance use disorder and subsequent social and health-related sequelae (e.g., increased rates of HIV and sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections), there remains a gap in our knowledge about how best to design and implement services for today's generations of various sub-groups of MSM who use drugs (e.g., MSM who are: young; Indigenous; economically deprived).

Dr. Knight's five-year population health research program will adapt health policy and service delivery practices to improve substance use treatment trajectories for key groups of MSM who use drugs and are at risk for severe health and/or social consequences (i.e., the criteria for substance use disorder, as defined under DSM-V criteria). The aim will be to identify the most efficacious and scalable combinations of strategies to adapt interventions that respond to MSM's individual needs and broader social and structural conditions. This approach to implementation science offers a way to go beyond describing the problem and to focus on building an evidence base for implementing and adapting context-sensitive and population-specific solutions into routine policy and practice.

With collaborators representing the BC Ministry of Health, Vancouver Coastal Health, BC Centre for Disease Control and YouthCO HIV/Hep C Society and the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, as well as through the engagement of the BC Centre on Substance Use's Community Advisory Board, Dr. Knight's findings will be used to inform the development of policies (including clinical and provincial guidelines) to effectively scale up and integrate services that have the capacity to improve substance use treatment trajectories for MSM. Contributions to new knowledge will include the identification of the individual, social and structural factors shaping MSM's ability to reduce problematic drug use and prevent severe health and social outcomes (e.g., HIV and/or Hep C). Study outputs will also be assessed at an annual Stakeholder Workshop in which recommendations will be developed and refined for clinical and provincial guidelines.